I know why the mathematicians weep(derekthompson.org)
370 points by RickJWagner 22 hours ago | 614 comments
tl;dr: OpenAI's recent release of hundreds of mathematical proofs—some solving centuries-old problems—has provoked grief and disorientation among mathematicians, with Fields Medalist Hugo Duminil-Copin and Cornell's Steven Strogatz describing tears and a sense their field has been "annihilated." The author argues their mourning isn't just bruised ego but reflects something deeper: science is both a craft and a multi-generational human conversation, and AI's arrival threatens to end that dialogue by completing the quest without participating in the relationship. Mathematicians are first, but physicists, economists, and writers may be next.
HN Discussion:
  • ↑AI commodifies the hard-won expertise that gave meaning and status to practitioners' lives
  • ↑The real loss is the collapse of truth-seeking and verification, as unread AI outputs are accepted uncritically
  • ↑History shows displaced professions suffer greatly, reinforcing the mourning is justified
  • ↑Philosophical frameworks like Brandom's deontic scorekeeping explain why AI can't participate in the human conceptual conversation
  • ↓The article misunderstands mathematicians or overstates AI's threat; mathematicians remain essential and sympathy is misplaced