Unsealed Briefs in Authors’ Case v. Microsoft/OpenAI(authorsguild.org)
626 points by papergirl 17 days ago | 612 comments
tl;dr: Unsealed filings in Authors Guild v. OpenAI reveal that OpenAI and Microsoft executives knowingly trained GPT models on pirated books from LibGen, with Microsoft aware of the practice as early as 2019. Internal communications show employees worried about "optics" rather than legality, discussed "autocompleting" George R.R. Martin's series, dismissed author complaints as "acceptable economic disruption," and launched "Project Clear" in 2022 to delete LibGen files and scrub mentions from internal systems. A hearing is expected in early 2027.
HN Discussion:
  • ↑Highlights damning quotes from execs worried about optics rather than legality
  • ↑Suggests the article's editorialized title accurately captures execs' awareness of wrongdoing
  • ↓Dismisses job-destruction framing as normal technological disruption
  • ↑Confirms LibGen content is largely copyrighted, undermining any public-domain defense
  • ↑Proposes legal remedy requiring models trained on others' IP to forfeit their own IP rights