David Sacks: OpenAI and Anthropic Don't Need Regulations to Pace Frontier Models(twitter.com)
310 points by kolanos 19 hours ago | 231 comments
tl;dr: David Sacks tells OpenAI and Anthropic that if they truly believe frontier models are dangerous, they should unilaterally slow down rather than demand regulatory frameworks, antitrust exemptions, or captured evaluators like METR to force competitors to do the same. He argues their "pace the frontier" pitch is self-interested—driven by product liability exposure and market demand for reliability—and that seeking regulation as the price of restraint amounts to regulatory capture or blackmail.
HN Discussion:
  • Frontier labs are seeking regulatory capture to kill smaller competitors and preserve margins
  • Labs are blackmailing the government and should face penalties rather than concessions
  • The slowdown pitch is cover for stagnating progress or IPO/financial positioning
  • Real product liability and control problems are driving the labs' behavior, not altruism
  • Models are genuinely dangerous and Amodei's voluntary-checks-plus-regulation approach is reasonable