It’s so hard to finish an idea that is not yours and is just suggested by AI(ssp.sh)
250 points by zazuke 15 days ago | 168 comments
tl;dr: The author argues against using AI to generate notes in Obsidian or other "second brain" systems, because AI-generated content dilutes your own thinking, creates noise when searching, and produces ideas that are hard to develop further since they aren't truly yours. They suggest limited uses like finding related notes or short summaries (clearly marked as AI), but warn that automated linking and knowledge graphs skip the crucial thinking process where real insights emerge. The value of a personal knowledge base comes from manually building connections over time.
HN Discussion:
  • AI-generated content pollutes codebases/notes with hallucinations treated as canonical later
  • ~Second brain systems themselves are questionable; thinking constantly is better than note-hoarding
  • Over-relying on AI suggestions atrophies deep thinking and turns researchers into prompters
  • AI is fine as a query/read layer over notes but shouldn't author content in them
  • Privacy concern: letting AI read private thoughts enables social engineering at scale