Aaron Swartz was prosecuted for scraping, while Meta does it without consequence(blog.curiousquail.com)
1623 points by speckx 1 day ago | 374 comments
tl;dr: Aaron Swartz faced 35 years in prison and a $1M fine for downloading 70GB of JSTOR articles for knowledge dissemination, ultimately taking his own life under the pressure. Meanwhile, Meta torrented 80TB of books to train its AI models and faces only a likely minor financial penalty. The author argues this disparity reflects a broken system that punishes public-interest actions while letting corporate piracy for profit go effectively unchecked.
HN Discussion:
  • Government prosecuted Swartz because it had nothing to lose, while sparing Meta protects AI investment
  • Swartz is being mythologized; he was a troubled person exploited by others, not a clean symbol
  • The article misrepresents facts — Swartz wasn't just scraping, he trespassed and evaded bans, and wasn't really facing 35 years
  • Copyright enforcement is really about protecting business models, which is why Meta gets a pass and Swartz didn't
  • ~Scraping shouldn't be criminalized for anyone; consistency shouldn't mean punishing Meta too