Humanising LLM Outputs Is Dumb(kuber.studio)
227 points by kuberwastaken 11 days ago | 167 comments
tl;dr: Instructing LLM agents to produce human-friendly output (short sentences, Simplified Technical English, "talk to me like I have ADHD") forces lossy compression during the actual work, hiding failures, uncertainty, and dense technical detail behind pleasant prose. Like databases, compilers, and APIs, agents should preserve high-fidelity state internally—especially when communicating with other agents—and only humanize output at the final boundary where a person consumes it. The viral "humanize my LLM" prompts are really a bug report about tooling that applies presentation logic at the wrong layer.
HN Discussion:
  • Verbose LLM output is cognitively exhausting and hard to parse, reinforcing the need for better handling
  • Users share prompts/techniques to strip friendliness, agreeing humanization is problematic
  • Anthropomorphizing LLMs is natural human behavior, so humanized output fits how people interact
  • The article misreads the intent: humanization prompts actually aim for terse machine-like output, not friendliness
  • Existing tooling (like Claude output styles) may already address the subagent compression problem raised