Making(beej.us)
385 points by erikschoster 21 hours ago | 151 comments
tl;dr: A Gen-X developer and CS instructor reflects on why AI-generated work—code, art, fiction—feels unfulfilling despite him initiating it: prompting an LLM feels like managing a contractor, not making something himself. He draws a fuzzy line between tools he uses (compilers, hammers) and agents he delegates to, acknowledging the gray area but concluding that the human-like, imprecise nature of LLM interaction puts them in the "asking someone else to make it" category, which robs him of the pride of creation.
HN Discussion:
  • Pride can still come from directing/orchestrating creation, like hiring contractors or being an architect
  • Shares the author's feeling of disconnection from AI-assisted work and misses the joy of manual creation
  • ~The distinction depends on personality type—systems thinkers enjoy LLMs, detail-oriented people don't
  • AI-generated content should be labeled/avoided because human ingenuity is what makes creation valuable
  • LLMs are genuinely useful tools for overcoming barriers with complex hardware/software one couldn't otherwise use