$100 AI Music Video: Claude Fable 5 vs. GPT-5.6 Sol(tryai.dev)
302 points by hershyb_ 16 hours ago | 400 comments
tl;dr: Two frontier models (Claude "Fable 5" and GPT "5.6 Sol") were given an autonomous tool-calling harness, a song, and $25/$100 budgets to research, generate, and edit a full music video via ffmpeg. All four runs completed valid videos, but quality was mediocre across the board: characters drifted between shots, lyrics were interpreted too literally, tempo matching was weak, and none of the models iterated on their edits or reviewed their own footage. Claude cost significantly more in tokens (~30-40% of total), while GPT-5.6 Sol was the more inventive editor, mixing multiple video models and adding overlays.
HN Discussion:
  • AI-generated videos lack artistic value; humans could do better with no budget
  • AI is undermining the economic foundation that supports working artists
  • Output failed because it interpreted lyrics too literally instead of building narrative arc
  • ~Better results are achievable with newer video models and human direction
  • Art is inherently human and AI-generated content lacks meaning regardless of quality