Flock-Powered Police Chiefs Stalking Women Shows Why Warrants Are Needed(ipvm.com)
552 points by jhonovich 18 hours ago | 256 comments
tl;dr: Multiple police chiefs and officers have been caught using Flock's license plate reader system to stalk romantic partners and rivals—including an Illinois chief who ran an ex-girlfriend's new boyfriend's plate 178 times—with the Institute for Justice documenting at least 18 such cases. Flock publicly claims it tracks vehicles, not people, but its own Chief Legal Officer admitted stalking is "the most common" abuse of the system. Civil liberties groups argue warrants should be required for LPR searches, as already mandated for GPS trackers, cell location data, and wiretaps.
HN Discussion:
  • Surveillance systems inevitably enable abuse and warrants/oversight are needed
  • Unmonitored access to power predictably leads to fraud and abuse
  • Citizens should actively oppose Flock installations as 4th Amendment violations
  • The article's framing of contradiction between 'rare' and 'most common' is logically flawed
  • Restricting surveillance/warrant requirements will just be circumvented by other means