Noise infusion banned from statistical products published by Census Bureau(desfontain.es)
874 points by nl 1 day ago | 572 comments
tl;dr: The US Department of Commerce has banned "noise infusion" — including differential privacy — from Census Bureau and BEA statistical releases, mandating coarsening and suppression instead. The author argues this will force a brutal trade-off: future releases will either be far less useful (especially for small/minority populations) or dangerously vulnerable to reconstruction attacks, since randomness is what makes such attacks computationally hard. Possible motivations range from enabling gerrymandering-friendly re-identification to simply pretending the privacy/utility trade-off doesn't exist.
HN Discussion:
  • Census taker worries the ban erodes trust and endangers vulnerable respondents and enumerators
  • Damaging data collection infrastructure harms institutional decision-making and will be regretted
  • Differential privacy is necessary to prevent reconstruction attacks and protect individuals
  • Suspicion that the ban serves gerrymandering by enabling individual reconstruction
  • Skepticism that DP was ever needed since prior censuses functioned fine without it